Just back from the climate rush www.climaterush.co.uk celebrating the achievements of the suffragettes 100 years ago & following their call to take direct action for the cause of today – climate change.
Explaining why she was prepared to risk jail for her beliefs, one of the organisers refered to Emmeline Pankhurst’s statement from 1913
-There are degrees of militancy. Some women are able to go further than others in militant action and each woman is the judge of her own duty so far as that is concerned. To be militant in some way or other is, however, a moral obligation. It is a duty which every woman will owe to her conscience and self-respect, to other women who are less fortunate than she is herself, and to all those who are to come after her.
If any woman refrains from militant protest against the injury done by the Governemnt and the House of Commons to women and to the race, she will share the responsibility for the crime. Submission under such circumstances will be itself a crime. –
Clearly she isn’t the only one prepared to take such risks to call the Government to account over their current emissions targets and plans to build new coal power-stations and airport expansions.
What do you think about this? Where you would put yourselves on this scale of militancy & why?